Talk:Indiana Pwns
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
And here it is. The new Twilight Hack. :) Still not quite as good as Bannerbomb, though, in my opinion. Sorry, guys.--OMIGHTY1 20:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Neither hack is "better". They both perform the exact same function.--Arikado 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. OrAreWeDancers 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --SifJar 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to the exploit found in SSBB? What was it again? Comex or something like that? --PotentialExperience
- Comex is the creator of both Bannerbomb and the SSBB exploit. Comex has released its beta. The reason this isn't a redux of Twilight Hack or Indiana Pwns is it doesn't modify save files and is supposed to be difficult to patch. OrAreWeDancers 03:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it's still really cool. and by "difficult to patch", I assume you mean difficult to fix (By Nintendo of course)? --PotentialExperience
- Comex is the creator of both Bannerbomb and the SSBB exploit. Comex has released its beta. The reason this isn't a redux of Twilight Hack or Indiana Pwns is it doesn't modify save files and is supposed to be difficult to patch. OrAreWeDancers 03:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever happened to the exploit found in SSBB? What was it again? Comex or something like that? --PotentialExperience
- I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --SifJar 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. OrAreWeDancers 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Does anybody know if this works on the system menu 4.2 update? --James Paige 02:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- It should work. Indiana Pwns just came out a few days ago (Coincidence? Methinks not.), which isn't enough time for Nintendo to test a fix. I'd expect SmashStack to work too. --Dialexio 02:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- OH SWEET JESUS. WHAT TIMING, EH? Momentum 03:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Smash Stack doesn't seem to be documented. Is it unreleased? --James Paige 03:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- SmashStack was released a while ago but only in an NTSC-U flavor. If you don't know what it is, SmashStack is comex's believed-to-be-unfixable Brawl exploit. --Dialexio 03:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- It is unfixable. They have no way of patching the game to fix the bug and its read directly off the SD card, so if they were to fix it they would have to do some MAJOR haxx that would bring SSBB's SD card speed to a halt. Xuzz 02:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do you think it would be possible to create a new bannerbomb-sorta exploit and combine it with this to code it in layers and make it harder for ninty to fix? --Abeckring 02:12, 31 August 2010 (CEST)
- Bannerbomb is done. Period. You can't combine exploits, they all use the same method (Crash the Wii, run an elf/dol loader in memory). --bg4545 03:20, 31 August 2010 (CEST)
- Do you think it would be possible to create a new bannerbomb-sorta exploit and combine it with this to code it in layers and make it harder for ninty to fix? --Abeckring 02:12, 31 August 2010 (CEST)
does not copy
when I try to copy over it says "the data may not have copied" I don't think I missed anything..is this part of the 4.2 update not allowing new saves to be copied over from SD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vapblack (talk • contribs) 17:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)