Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of homebrew applications"
m (oops) |
Blooper4912 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Archive box | ||
+ | |[[/Archive 1]]}} | ||
+ | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Concerning the Elderly== | ==Concerning the Elderly== |
Revision as of 03:09, 27 August 2008
![]() Archives |
/Archive 1 |
Concerning the Elderly
Abandoned apps that have been obsoleted by more stable/featureful ones should be removed from the list and relocated to a retirement category where they will be given prescription drugs and sit around talking about how nobody ever visits them. I'm sure most people can think of at least a few abandoned apps that no longer belong. Flark 07:14, 9 July 2008 (CEST)
- I agree, Old apps need to be relocated to a special page and not deleted, in case someone finds a use for them again. --Initrd.gz 5:04 PM, 15 August 2009 (CDT)
date column?
it would be useful (to me) to have a "last updated" column with month/day/year so i can see what's changed since i looked last without going through the wiki revisions - unless there's another way to do this that i'm not aware of
Idea: Add peripherals to each table
Improvement to compare similar emulators. Shrink peripheral icons to not be obtrusive.
- There is already the Homebrew apps/Peripheral info page for that. I plan to merge that page into the individual list pages so they are used and updated more often. --Blooper4912
Notable Applications?
I think that homebrew browser and dragon media player are not in the same league with the others on the list. I would either remove them from the list or add Starfall, MPlayer (Team Twiizers), ftpii and Quake to it. Maybe the best thing would be to have a "notable apps" on every homebrew category page? Xyrion 00:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Personally, I'd rather flat-out remove it. Aside from the obvious like the Twilight Hack, who's to say what's "notable" and what isn't? - トウメイ 03:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)