Talk:Title metadata: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
reserved? |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
In the table of offsets 0x19A is listed with a length of 62 and id reserved can anyone provide more information as to what this section actually contains.[[User:Eckyecky|Eckyecky]] 13:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | In the table of offsets 0x19A is listed with a length of 62 and id reserved can anyone provide more information as to what this section actually contains.[[User:Eckyecky|Eckyecky]] 13:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
: As with most documentation, "reserved" means "Currently always zero, but the contents of this field probably aren't checked by any current software so it doesn't matter what you put here. This may change in the future, so you should avoid changing this because it's ... reserved." --[[User:Bushing|Bushing]] 12:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 8 May 2009
I was using this page, and I thought it is missing a table like the others files structure reprensentation (ie : with Start End Length and Description, like the WAD file page for exemple).
C code declaration is usefull for source code, but not for looking in a hex editor...
Do you think I can make tables here ? (it is my first contribution, so I prefer ask before...) moquette 23:22, 20 May 2008 (PDT)
- I agree, this page should follow the other by using a table with offsets. Check out how the other pages are designed using the template, and go ahead and do it! It there is some problem, it is always possible to back out your changes and return to an older version. Also, please add "~~~~" at the end of your messages on the talk page. This will sign your contribution with your login ID and a timestamp. Magicus 10:36, 19 May 2008 (PDT)
In the table of offsets 0x19A is listed with a length of 62 and id reserved can anyone provide more information as to what this section actually contains.Eckyecky 13:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- As with most documentation, "reserved" means "Currently always zero, but the contents of this field probably aren't checked by any current software so it doesn't matter what you put here. This may change in the future, so you should avoid changing this because it's ... reserved." --Bushing 12:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)