Line 90:
Line 90:
::If it contains any code from the previous gpl'd version, then the new source must also be released under the gpl. So a nearly complete re-write is not enough. It must be 100% re-written in order to allow the app to be closed source. At least that is my understanding. Correct me if I am wrong. --[[User:Flark|Flark]] 00:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
::If it contains any code from the previous gpl'd version, then the new source must also be released under the gpl. So a nearly complete re-write is not enough. It must be 100% re-written in order to allow the app to be closed source. At least that is my understanding. Correct me if I am wrong. --[[User:Flark|Flark]] 00:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
:::The original author (in this case Nuke) is free to re-license his application under whatever license he likes to as long as all contributors agree. And exactly this has happened here: Nuke no longer wants to keep this opensource and all other people who contributed agreed. --[[User:Svpe|Svpe]] 08:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
:::The original author (in this case Nuke) is free to re-license his application under whatever license he likes to as long as all contributors agree. And exactly this has happened here: Nuke no longer wants to keep this opensource and all other people who contributed agreed. --[[User:Svpe|Svpe]] 08:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
+
::::Wow, I didn't know you could do that. I figured it was "once open source, always open source", but this changes a lot of things. Thanks. --[[User:Flark|Flark]] 17:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Exactly, pirates would just want the features from 1.8 incorporating into the wii backup loader, it's their decision to keep it closed source, (for now) at the moment brkirch said.
Exactly, pirates would just want the features from 1.8 incorporating into the wii backup loader, it's their decision to keep it closed source, (for now) at the moment brkirch said.