5,579
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
probably built in an emergency? it was forked from IOS4 while IOS5 has WC24 code
Line 10:
Line 10:
IOS9 was the only active IOS that had one content; [[IOS11]] and above had a content containing build info, and a content containing the actual [[ARM Binaries|ARM binary]]. When [[IOS254]]v1 was released (a copy of v516), it inherited this unusual property. IOS9 was given a separate content for its build tag in [[4.2rev04]], and IOS254 was stubbed in [[4.3rev02]], leaving all IOSes with a separate content for build info.
IOS9 was the only active IOS that had one content; [[IOS11]] and above had a content containing build info, and a content containing the actual [[ARM Binaries|ARM binary]]. When [[IOS254]]v1 was released (a copy of v516), it inherited this unusual property. IOS9 was given a separate content for its build tag in [[4.2rev04]], and IOS254 was stubbed in [[4.3rev02]], leaving all IOSes with a separate content for build info.
+
+Most IOSes stem from IOS11-[[IOS13]]; these IOSes were forked from [[IOS5]]v5, so it is likely that IOS9 was built in a hurry from [[IOS4]] due to the [[WiiConnect24]] code (and possibly other network code) not working, since IOS5 was the first IOS to support WiiConnect24, while IOS9 is specifically blacklisted in [[KD (SDK)|KD]]. This would explain the AOSS bug that was fixed in [[IOS10]], and the forced update on 1.0 consoles when connecting to the internet.
This [[IOS]] only has one LED pattern: blinking.
This [[IOS]] only has one LED pattern: blinking.