oversight, Administrators
2,080
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
→Why not use dopmii ?
:Because DOP Mii must be run on a trucha-bugged IOS, and has all sorts of options for "patching" the IOS. This tool can be run on an unmodified Wii and installs a 100% virgin copy of IOS58. --[[User:Tantric|Tantric]] 21:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
:Because DOP Mii must be run on a trucha-bugged IOS, and has all sorts of options for "patching" the IOS. This tool can be run on an unmodified Wii and installs a 100% virgin copy of IOS58. --[[User:Tantric|Tantric]] 21:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
::Really? I thought it could run on any IOS, it only needs a trucha-bugged one to install modified IOSes. If you want to install a clean IOS on a clean Wii, I think it would work just fine. [[User:Yossi|Yossi]] 00:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
::Really? I thought it could run on any IOS, it only needs a trucha-bugged one to install modified IOSes. If you want to install a clean IOS on a clean Wii, I think it would work just fine. [[User:Yossi|Yossi]] 00:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
::: Uh, no. DOP Mii clearly tells you that you must be running an IOS that accepts fakesigning. And that's what DOP Mii does - it downloads contents, decrypts, patches if you asked it to, then encrypts and installs. --[[User:Tantric|Tantric]] 01:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
==Source code available?==
==Source code available?==
Your comments regarding DOP-Mii sparked my curiosity.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 22:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Your comments regarding DOP-Mii sparked my curiosity.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 22:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)