User talk:Gu1dry: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→bold italics v.s. bold: new section |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
why are you changing every page to have it's own name in bold italics? | why are you changing every page to have it's own name in bold italics? | ||
the point of self linking with [ [ and ] ] is so that if the text is ever copied somewhere else, it will still link back to the original page. as it happens, the wiki software chooses to render a self-link in bold only. --[[User:Yossi|Yossi]] 19:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | the point of self linking with [ [ and ] ] is so that if the text is ever copied somewhere else, it will still link back to the original page. as it happens, the wiki software chooses to render a self-link in bold only. --[[User:Yossi|Yossi]] 19:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:There's no point in having piped links of the article within the article, it's redundant. And why would some copy the intro text to somewhere, that makes no sense, if they do, they should at least be start enough to pipe link the article.<small>[[User:Gu1dry|「ɠu¹ɖяy」]] 19:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 20:33, 18 October 2009
Hey Thanks!
Thank You For Helping Out On My Wii Bash Page! - Mellon!
Mellon! 01:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
bold italics v.s. bold
why are you changing every page to have it's own name in bold italics? the point of self linking with [ [ and ] ] is so that if the text is ever copied somewhere else, it will still link back to the original page. as it happens, the wiki software chooses to render a self-link in bold only. --Yossi 19:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's no point in having piped links of the article within the article, it's redundant. And why would some copy the intro text to somewhere, that makes no sense, if they do, they should at least be start enough to pipe link the article.「ɠu¹ɖяy」 19:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)