3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 5:
Line 5: − +
*Signed*
:::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
:::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
::::Whatever happened to the exploit found in SSBB? What was it again? Comex or something like that? --[[User:PotentialExperience|PotentialExperience]]
::::Whatever happened to the exploit found in SSBB? What was it again? Comex or something like that? --[[User:PotentialExperience|PotentialExperience]]
:::::[[User:Comex|Comex]] is the creator of both Bannerbomb and the SSBB exploit. [http://gamingexposed.com/releases/wii-releases/537-smashstack-released.html Comex has released its beta.] The reason this isn't a redux of Twilight Hack or Indiana Pwns is it doesn't modify save files and is supposed to be difficult to patch.
:::::[[User:Comex|Comex]] is the creator of both Bannerbomb and the SSBB exploit. [http://gamingexposed.com/releases/wii-releases/537-smashstack-released.html Comex has released its beta.] The reason this isn't a redux of Twilight Hack or Indiana Pwns is it doesn't modify save files and is supposed to be difficult to patch. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)