33
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: − ::::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)+ +
no edit summary
:Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
:Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
::No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
::No, Bannerbomb is definitely better. Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible. Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit. In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
:::I agree. Why release another exploit when there is still a working one which doesn't require a game? IMO, SmashStack and Indiana Pwns should have been kept till bannerbomb was patched. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 20:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
::::Whatever happened to the exploit found in SSBB? What was it again? Comex or something like that? --[[User:PotentialExperience|PotentialExperience]]