Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
349 bytes added ,  05:44, 25 September 2009
m
My opinion is irrefutably the correct one.
Line 2: Line 2:  
Still not quite as good as Bannerbomb, though, in my opinion. Sorry, guys.--[[User:OMIGHTY1|OMIGHTY1]] 20:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 
Still not quite as good as Bannerbomb, though, in my opinion. Sorry, guys.--[[User:OMIGHTY1|OMIGHTY1]] 20:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:Neither hack is "better". They both perform the '''exact same function'''.--[[User:Arikado|Arikado]] 20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
::No, Bannerbomb is definitely better.  Anybody can use Bannerbomb on any Wii, making it more accessible.  Only people with an Indiana Jones disc can use this exploit.  In my opinion, Team Twiizers should have waited for Nintendo to fix Bannerbomb before releasing this exploit. [[User:OrAreWeDancers|OrAreWeDancers]] 03:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Navigation menu