11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: +
no edit summary
:::It's a good idea, I'll give it a try...--[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 07:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
:::It's a good idea, I'll give it a try...--[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 07:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
::::I've added all the features above but i have a problem with the ruler.png the max width of a picture is 1024 pixels and to get Lbs its supposed to go all the way to 310 and the ruler goes to 150. so if anybody has a solution it will be welcome...--[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 14:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
::::I've added all the features above but i have a problem with the ruler.png the max width of a picture is 1024 pixels and to get Lbs its supposed to go all the way to 310 and the ruler goes to 150. so if anybody has a solution it will be welcome...--[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] 14:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::Why even have a "ruler" with the weight. While analog displays are cool, but digital accuracy is so nice. How bout a choice? I honestly would much rather see a digital readout of my weight vs an analog scale. [[User:Dewdude|Dewdude]] 17:32, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Great utility! One problem though - the weight ruller view is to small! On my 28" tv it's hardly readable. Bigger display would be helpful for people with smaler/ older tvs or sight disabilities. It would also be great to have a channel or channel forwarder for this, but that's other subject.
Great utility! One problem though - the weight ruller view is to small! On my 28" tv it's hardly readable. Bigger display would be helpful for people with smaler/ older tvs or sight disabilities. It would also be great to have a channel or channel forwarder for this, but that's other subject.