Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:  
The page said the images are under a Attribution-Share Alike licence, but the link is to a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike licence? [[User:Felix|Felix]] 12:31, 8 July 2008 (CEST)
 
The page said the images are under a Attribution-Share Alike licence, but the link is to a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike licence? [[User:Felix|Felix]] 12:31, 8 July 2008 (CEST)
 
:You are perfectly right, corrected (although I will not update the readme in the archive for this, since noncommercial is mentioned in the text anyway). I am, however, still thinking about the license, generally. For the time being, Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike seemed like a safe route to go, but I don't have a problem releasing it under another license if someone could point out a better suited one. [[User:Drmr|Drmr]] 15:50, 8 July 2008 (CEST)
 
:You are perfectly right, corrected (although I will not update the readme in the archive for this, since noncommercial is mentioned in the text anyway). I am, however, still thinking about the license, generally. For the time being, Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike seemed like a safe route to go, but I don't have a problem releasing it under another license if someone could point out a better suited one. [[User:Drmr|Drmr]] 15:50, 8 July 2008 (CEST)
 +
As I understand it, under the LGPL I would only be able to use these cursors if I either provide the source code for my program or load the cursors from files included with the program.  So I would not be able to embed the cursor into my binary unless I released the source?  [[User:Chris|Chris]] 16:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
330

edits

Navigation menu