Talk:LibWiiSharp: Difference between revisions

From WiiBrew
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pokechu22 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
:Seeing how the project hasn't been updated in a very long time, wouldn't it be better to contact the user through mail, or remove the keys and upload the source as a zip here?
:Seeing how the project hasn't been updated in a very long time, wouldn't it be better to contact the user through mail, or remove the keys and upload the source as a zip here?
:this way the project isn't removed and its code is preserved [[User:DacoTaco|DacoTaco]] ([[User talk:DacoTaco|talk]]) 12:18, 15 August 2021 (CEST)
:this way the project isn't removed and its code is preserved [[User:DacoTaco|DacoTaco]] ([[User talk:DacoTaco|talk]]) 12:18, 15 August 2021 (CEST)
::I don't think it's worth removing something because it includes keys.  The keys are [https://hackmii.com/2008/04/keys-keys-keys/ on a Hackmii post by bushing].  Wikipedia also includes similar keys in the articles on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy the AACS encryption key controversy] and on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number illegal numbers], which is a stronger precedent for keeping them around.
::If the source code itself with the keys were uploaded to the wiki, then I could vaguely understand censoring it (though I'd still disagree), but it's also not even hosted on site and instead on Google Code.  It seems silly to preventatively delete articles of something useful over keys that are publicly available on the main site. --[[User:Pokechu22|Pokechu22]] ([[User talk:Pokechu22|talk]]) 23:04, 15 August 2021 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 22:04, 15 August 2021

Delete?

Just went through the code, and the common and korean keys seem to be here. Hallowizer (talk) 04:21, 15 August 2021 (CEST)

Seeing how the project hasn't been updated in a very long time, wouldn't it be better to contact the user through mail, or remove the keys and upload the source as a zip here?
this way the project isn't removed and its code is preserved DacoTaco (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2021 (CEST)
I don't think it's worth removing something because it includes keys. The keys are on a Hackmii post by bushing. Wikipedia also includes similar keys in the articles on the AACS encryption key controversy and on illegal numbers, which is a stronger precedent for keeping them around.
If the source code itself with the keys were uploaded to the wiki, then I could vaguely understand censoring it (though I'd still disagree), but it's also not even hosted on site and instead on Google Code. It seems silly to preventatively delete articles of something useful over keys that are publicly available on the main site. --Pokechu22 (talk) 23:04, 15 August 2021 (CEST)