5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 289:
Line 289: + + + +
→System menu blackout???: new section
:it shouldn't be. only if you are going to install 0.5 with HBC 1.0.7 or 1.0.8. so just use 0.7 and you'll be fine. --[[User:DacoTaco|DacoTaco]] 08:36, 18 October 2011 (CEST)
:it shouldn't be. only if you are going to install 0.5 with HBC 1.0.7 or 1.0.8. so just use 0.7 and you'll be fine. --[[User:DacoTaco|DacoTaco]] 08:36, 18 October 2011 (CEST)
::Priiloader modifies your NAND, and so is inherently dangerous HOWEVER provided there is no power cut and you use the latest version, you SHOULD be OK. But like with anything that modifies NAND, there is a risk involved, and you accept full responsibility for the consequences. The method used to install HBC is completely irrelevant and does not affect installation of Priiloader in anyway. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 19:17, 18 October 2011 (CEST)
::Priiloader modifies your NAND, and so is inherently dangerous HOWEVER provided there is no power cut and you use the latest version, you SHOULD be OK. But like with anything that modifies NAND, there is a risk involved, and you accept full responsibility for the consequences. The method used to install HBC is completely irrelevant and does not affect installation of Priiloader in anyway. --[[User:SifJar|SifJar]] 19:17, 18 October 2011 (CEST)
== System menu blackout??? ==
Why in the world would you want to use the hack that blacks out the system menu?! --[[User:ScoopGracie|ScoopGracie]] ([[User talk:ScoopGracie|talk]]) 01:48, 6 May 2020 (CEST)