Difference between revisions of "Talk:AnyTitle Deleter/AnyTitle Deleter DB"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(lulz, and nice) |
Hotzenplotz (talk | contribs) (→Disable brick protection?!: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Nice work== | ==Nice work== | ||
Nice work MrClick. Glad to see someone found a good use for my code =) --[[User:SquidMan|SquidMan]] 04:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | Nice work MrClick. Glad to see someone found a good use for my code =) --[[User:SquidMan|SquidMan]] 04:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Disable brick protection?! == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is there any sane reason, why you would give an option to disable the brick protection? I can tell you that this option (even if it's not activated) makes me not want to use your branch, cause I just don't feel safe using it anymore. [[User:Hotzenplotz|Hotzenplotz]] 09:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:29, 22 February 2009
Not banner.bin
The name is stored in the 0'th content index, or 00000000.app, not banner.bin (stored in the IMET header).
- Obviously you didn't look hard enough at the code, dummy. It gets the data directory, not the content directory. Inside the data directory there is always a banner.bin file with the banner. Yes, I know this app does that, I just looked at the code. Lol --SquidMan 04:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Nice work
Nice work MrClick. Glad to see someone found a good use for my code =) --SquidMan 04:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Disable brick protection?!
Is there any sane reason, why you would give an option to disable the brick protection? I can tell you that this option (even if it's not activated) makes me not want to use your branch, cause I just don't feel safe using it anymore. Hotzenplotz 09:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)