Difference between revisions of "Talk:Signing bug"
Hallowizer (talk | contribs) (→The other signing bug: new section) |
Jhynjhiruu (talk | contribs) (→Broken reference: new section) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Is the fixed padding bug still a thing as well? [[User:Hallowizer|Hallowizer]] ([[User talk:Hallowizer|talk]]) 23:27, 25 May 2021 (CEST) | Is the fixed padding bug still a thing as well? [[User:Hallowizer|Hallowizer]] ([[User talk:Hallowizer|talk]]) 23:27, 25 May 2021 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Broken reference == | ||
+ | |||
+ | It would appear that the URL to the reference I just added is blocked by the spam filter, because of the site name. Oh well. [[User:Jhynjhiruu|Jhynjhiruu]] ([[User talk:Jhynjhiruu|talk]]) 21:00, 2 July 2023 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 21:00, 2 July 2023
"NULL" should be spelled "NUL" in this context. "NULL" in C refers to a special pointer value, while "NUL" is a zero ASCII character value.
- NULL is OK http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_character --Pepsiman 09:55, 26 March 2008 (PDT)
That's it?
That's the big singing bug? Some genius used strncmp instead of memcmp to compare binary data? ROFL. 198.166.12.229 11:41, 27 March 2008 (PDT)
- I'm afraid so. Also, they didn't bother checking any of the padding, either -- which would have at least made it much more difficult to exploit. Bushing 14:00, 27 March 2008 (PDT)
Code example
Well, I don't want to start a revert war against an admin. That's stupid. I preffer to keep my ban wars on IRC.
I think that my example gets the point out, the point isn't to be exact in what the IOS code does, the point is to show an example of how this class of bugs looks like. While I can't deny the fact that bushing's code is much more real, it hides the point of the example code by being too big. It's a lot of cruff and largely a pain to figure out where the bug is. I think that clarity is better than realism here.--henke37 13:29, 16 July 2008 (CEST)
The other signing bug
Is the fixed padding bug still a thing as well? Hallowizer (talk) 23:27, 25 May 2021 (CEST)
Broken reference
It would appear that the URL to the reference I just added is blocked by the spam filter, because of the site name. Oh well. Jhynjhiruu (talk) 21:00, 2 July 2023 (CEST)