Difference between revisions of "Talk:IOS/Syscalls"
< Talk:IOS
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: All of these syscalls are internal to IOS; you can't call them from PPC code. [[User:Bushing|Bushing]] 14:25, 27 June 2008 (CEST) | : All of these syscalls are internal to IOS; you can't call them from PPC code. [[User:Bushing|Bushing]] 14:25, 27 June 2008 (CEST) | ||
:: Allright, thanks for the clarification --[[User:SquidMan|SquidMan]] 21:40, 27 June 2008 (CEST) | :: Allright, thanks for the clarification --[[User:SquidMan|SquidMan]] 21:40, 27 June 2008 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == nullsub == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Can it be that those 2 syscalls are only nullsubs? | ||
+ | 38 iobuf_log_header_info | ||
+ | 39 iobuf_log_buffer_info | ||
+ | |||
+ | Because in IOS 70 they point on | ||
+ | |||
+ | FFFF5B94 BX LR | ||
+ | |||
+ | and | ||
+ | |||
+ | FFFF5B90 BX LR | ||
+ | |||
+ | sorry for my bad english | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Maybe. Syscalls change around in various IOS versions. --[[User:Svpe|Svpe]] 17:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:47, 13 May 2010
Hey, uh, isn't that set_public_key function a bit... dangerous? I mean, if you called that, you could do some serious damage... Also, do you have an example of where it is called (no I don't mean the actual call to it, but I mean like what code uses it) because it seems slightly interesting. --SquidMan 11:45, 27 June 2008 (CEST)
- All of these syscalls are internal to IOS; you can't call them from PPC code. Bushing 14:25, 27 June 2008 (CEST)
- Allright, thanks for the clarification --SquidMan 21:40, 27 June 2008 (CEST)
nullsub
Can it be that those 2 syscalls are only nullsubs? 38 iobuf_log_header_info 39 iobuf_log_buffer_info
Because in IOS 70 they point on
FFFF5B94 BX LR
and
FFFF5B90 BX LR
sorry for my bad english
- Maybe. Syscalls change around in various IOS versions. --Svpe 17:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC)